SINGAPORE (Reuters) – Singapore’s anti-trust physique proposed fines on ride-hailing companies Seize and Uber, provisionally discovering that their merger had decreased competitors and suggesting cures such because the sale of their car-leasing companies.

FILE PHOTO: A ComfortDelgro taxi passes Uber and Seize places of work in Singapore March 26, 2018. REUTERS/Edgar Su/File Photograph

The Competitors and Client Fee of Singapore (CCCS) additionally warned that it might require the businesses to unwind the merger relying on whether or not the cures are profitable however added a reversal will not be possible, citing Uber’s exit from the market after the deal.

Uber [UBER.UL] offered its Southeast Asian enterprise to larger regional rival Seize in March in trade for a stake within the Singapore-based agency, following related offers by the U.S. agency in China and Russia.

However the deal has invited regulatory scrutiny within the area, with the CCCS, in a uncommon transfer, launching a probe, days after the transaction was introduced.

The fee mentioned in a press release on Thursday it proposed the fines as a result of Uber and Seize carried out the transaction regardless of having anticipated potential competitors considerations, resulting in lesser competitors within the sector in Singapore.

That is the primary time the fee would impose fines on a merger transaction. The CCCS mentioned it should think about the businesses’ representations earlier than it finalizes the precise quantity of the fines.

Uber directed queries to Seize.

Seize mentioned in a press release that it disagreed with the regulator’s discovering which it mentioned seemed to be primarily based on a slender definition of competitors. “We’ll take all acceptable steps to attraction towards this resolution,” it mentioned.

CCCS proposed remedial steps equivalent to eradicating exclusivity obligations on drivers who use Seize’s ride-hailing platform in addition to its exclusivity preparations with taxi fleets. It additionally proposed that Seize keep its pre-transaction pricing algorithm and driver fee charges till competitors is revived available in the market.

It mentioned it may ask Uber to promote its Lion Metropolis Leases car-leasing unit to any potential competitor who makes an inexpensive provide and forestall its sale to Seize with out the authority’s permission. CCCS additionally mentioned remedial measures may embody a sale by Seize of its leasing unit.


CCCS has invited public suggestions on the proposed cures.

It mentioned it might require the events to unwind the transaction until the suggestions confirms that any of the proposed cures, or any additional cures, are ample to handle the competitors considerations, and are implementable in apply.

In its public session, the fee famous that an unwinding, together with a reversal of Seize’s stake gross sales to Uber and the switch of property from Uber to Seize, will not be possible as Uber’s exit will not be virtually reversed.

“I don’t assume unwinding (in a conventional sense) goes to occur, as a result of I simply don’t see a sensible method for it to occur,” mentioned Walter Theseira, an economics professor on the Singapore College of Social Sciences.

He cited difficulties in separating Seize and Uber’s drivers and clients, in addition to dividing Singapore geographically.

Consultants have beforehand mentioned there was little the authorities can do to cease Uber from merely exiting the area.

Some analysts mentioned unwinding may take totally different types.

“It doesn’t need to be a complete unwinding. But it surely might be an unwind within the sense for Seize to now unload a part of its enterprise to a different ride-hailing service supplier,” mentioned Gerald Singham, deputy managing accomplice at legislation agency Dentons Rodyk.

The CCCS mentioned the companies accomplished the deal and started the switch of the acquired property instantly, regardless of their very own view that the result can be irreversible, thus making it virtually not possible to revive the established order pre-merger.

Its investigations additionally revealed the events had even supplied for a mechanism to apportion eventual antitrust monetary penalties.

Seize was the dominant participant in Singapore’s ride-hailing market even earlier than the Uber merger. It additionally competes with taxi companies equivalent to ComfortDelGro Corp Ltd.

A number of new gamers, equivalent to India’s Jugnoo and Singapore-based Ryde, have not too long ago entered the ride-hailing market within the city-state. Indonesia’s dominant participant Go-Jek has additionally mentioned it might launch companies in Singapore.

Reporting by Jack Kim and Aradhana Aravindan; Enhancing by Himani Sarkar and Muralikumar Anantharaman